In force
Sources & Attribution Policy
How Orbis Signal collects, classifies, attributes, and displays sources in daily briefings.
This policy binds how sources are collected, classified into tiers, displayed in briefings, and blocked when they violate integrity rules.
This binds
Every material claim traces to a public URL in the locked evidence record. Displayed URLs are a subset of that record.
This does not replace
- Verification Policy — The evidence lock and quality scorecard
- Editorial Policy — How those sources are used in judgments
Every material claim is traceable to a publicly accessible source URL collected during live web research.
URLs displayed in a published briefing are a subset of URLs locked in the topic's evidence record — enforced by automated validation.
Confirmed claims require at least one tier-1 source. Tier-3 sources alone cannot support confirmed or inference-level judgments; when only tier-3 sourcing is available, the claim must be labelled speculation.
Invented URLs, presenting tier-3 commentary as tier-1, and confirmed claims without a traceable tier-1 source are prohibited.
We link to sources as retrieved at production time. We cannot guarantee perpetual accessibility of third-party links, and we do not republish full third-party content.
1. Attribution principle
Every material claim in an Orbis Signal briefing is traceable to a publicly accessible source URL collected during live web research. We do not publish unattributed assertions, anonymous sourcing without epistemic qualification, or references to sources that were not retrieved and recorded during production.
Source attribution is not decorative. It is the foundation of our verification model. URLs displayed in a published briefing are a subset of URLs locked in the topic's evidence record — enforced by automated validation before publication.
2. How sources are collected
Sources are gathered through web-grounded research at the beginning of each production cycle. Research retrieves current reporting, official releases, and institutional publications relevant to the developments selected for the edition.
For each topic — politics, finance, and technology — research prefers established outlets appropriate to the domain. Preference guides discovery; it does not exclude other qualifying sources.
Each source is recorded with:
- A secure HTTPS URL
- Publisher name and article title
- A tier classification (see below)
- A unique identifier linking it to specific claims
3. Source tier definitions
All sources are classified into three tiers based on proximity to primary information:
- Tier 1 — Primary: newswires, official government and central bank releases, primary documents, named institutional data, company earnings calls, and major wire-service reporting (e.g. Reuters, AP, Bloomberg, FT, WSJ)
- Tier 2 — Analytic: established policy and financial analysis from identified authors and research institutions (e.g. The Economist, CFR, IISS, BIS, major think-tank reports, rated bank research)
- Tier 3 — Commentary: opinion pieces, blogs, aggregators, and reporting that relies on unnamed sources
Tier rules enforced in production:
- At least one tier-1 source is required for any claim labelled confirmed
- Tier-3 sources alone cannot support confirmed or inference-level judgments
- When only tier-3 sourcing is available, the claim must be labelled speculation
- Source lists stay lean — high-quality attribution, not exhaustive marginal references
4. How sources appear in briefings
Each published briefing includes a Sources section listing the outlets referenced, ordered with lead-story sources first. Each entry displays the publisher, title, tier classification, and link to the original material.
Event articles embedded in briefings carry their own source URL lists, also validated against the evidence record. Inline references within analytical sections do not replace the consolidated sources section — both serve different reader needs.
5. Source integrity rules
The following source practices are prohibited and blocked by our quality controls:
- Invented or hallucinated URLs not present in the evidence record
- Presenting tier-3 commentary as equivalent to tier-1 primary reporting
- Confirmed claims without a traceable tier-1 source in the evidence record
- Aggregating sources without distinguishing tier quality in the published list
6. Limitations
We link to original sources as they were retrieved at production time. URLs may subsequently change, paywalls may restrict access, or original articles may be removed by publishers. We cannot guarantee perpetual accessibility of third-party links.
We do not republish full third-party content. Briefings synthesise and analyse; readers should consult linked sources for original reporting and full context.
Related: Verification Policy, Editorial Policy.